Panic Watch!

About us | Contact | rss
Survival kit | Panic rankings | Blog archive | FAQ |Good links | Bad links
The Worst Panic
Posted April 25, 2008 by
What better way to end the traditional blogger dead-spell than with the scariest story imaginable: Panic over 'penis snatching' sorcerers. Yes, times are tough. You can't even walk along a Congolese street these days without some sorcerer or another using voodoo on your wang.
Thankfully most of the sorcerers (thirteen of them) have been rounded up and put behind bars. No word if the missing penises have been found yet, but the search WILL continue.
Posted in Nutjobs
Media Stretches Shark Tale
Posted March 09, 2008 by

Almost every shark attack generates a media feeding frenzy that any school of sharks would envy. The recent death of a diver off the Florida coast is no exception. Various media outlets have reported it as a horrific maiming by a vicious killing machine, but former jounalist and current diver Christopher Chin exposes the truth.
This was a terrible and tragic accident. However, it was just that - an accident. The shark was biting at a crate of bait, when it accidentally bit Markus Groh on the calf. Realizing it had made a mistake, the shark released Mr. Groh's leg, and moved on. His leg was cut, but no flesh was removed. If the shark was desirous of human flesh, or was intent on attacking any of the people involved in this dive, it could have easily finished the job, rather than releasing Groh's leg and moving on.
Why one newspaper claimed that Groh was bitten on the thigh, I cannot understand. I will give the reporter the benefit of the doubt and presume he was not intentionally trying to make the injury seem more substantial than it was. However, when this single, mistaken bite on the calf transforms into a report that "his leg was nearly torn off," as reported in another article, the intent of sensationalizing the story is apparent. The reporting gets absolutely ridiculous when we see this same single bite and release translated into, as one large network put it, Mr. Groh being "mauled to death."
He continues:
The truth of the matter still remains: Sharks do not eat people, and sharks do not target people.
I'll repeat that: SHARKS DO NOT EAT PEOPLE .
This event was a terrible, but freak accident. Roughly 40 people die each year in parachuting accidents in the US alone. An equal number die in skiing accidents, again, just in the US. In 2007, there was only ONE shark related fatality... worldwide. Yet, we managed to kill more than 100 million of them. =(
Read the rest of this depressing article here.
Posted in Animals, Media Panic
Panic Rankings for February
Posted March 09, 2008 by
The latest Panic Rankings have been posted, covering the month of February plus a little extra on both ends. Mad cow disease was the top mover thanks to a new case discovered in Canada (which the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has repeatedly said is expected...these are sporadic residual cases as Canada moves to eradicate the disease completely within a decade) along with the videotaped cow abuse in the U.S.
Other scary movers for the month included the flu and salmonella. Falling out of the spotlight last month were bird flu (although we're still warned not to be complacent!), MRSA, nuclear waste, and cell phones.
Check the full chart to see what's new with the same old scares!
Posted in Media Panic
Vaccine Quacks Rejoice!
Posted March 07, 2008 by

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims' decision to pay a family for their daughter's autistic symptoms, which they claim were caused by vaccines, is being heralded around the quack community as a divine gift--something like Christmas, a birthday, and New Years all rolled into one.
Government officials can try to downplay this as much as they want but it won't stop the celebration.
While parents and advocates for autistic children say the case is a landmark legal precedent that signals the government is finally conceding potential autism-related risks from childhood vaccines, government officials are saying it's nothing of the kind.
"This does not represent anything other than a very special situation," said Dr. Julie Gerberding, head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
...
CDC officials decline to talk about the Poling case, but they said Hannah's case should not be used to draw conclusions about risks for other children.
In time, the specifics of this case will be twisted or ignored completely and it will become just another bulleted item on every chelation/mercury/anti-vaccination website trying to sucker people into a bogus medical treatment or activist campaign.
You don't have to take my word for it; it's already starting.
SafeMinds has posted 4 links to versions of the story, transcripts of a Don Imus radio interview, and an official press release of their own:
SafeMinds executive director, Sallie Bernard, expressed concern over this latest evidence of the link between autism, vaccines and mercury.
Only problem is there wasn't any evidence presented here. "The family filed a claim with the federal vaccine compensation program in 2002, which the government ultimately decided to concede before any evidentiary hearing."
Numerous recent studies have shown no link between vaccines and autism. But sadly these will all be ignored in favor of a high-profile court case.
Posted in Media Panic, Disease
Panicology
Posted March 06, 2008 by

If you're looking for a high quality portable guide to media panic (and who the hell isn't?) check out Panicology, a new book by statisticians Simon Briscoe and Hugh Aldersey-Williams. The book takes a hard look at over forty of today's latest and greatest scare stories and cuts through the nonsense with critical thinking and a bit of wit. In places the book is a tad UK-centric but most of the topics apply to us all--because they're the same damn ones that fill newspapers the world over on a daily basis. Superbugs. Crime. Nanotechnology. Frankenfoods. Overpopulation and alien invaders. It's all here folks.
The book also examines why we, as humans, can't seem to get enough of this stuff and want to blame ourselves for all of it.
We live in a complex world and we don't want to die. And in general we are winning the battle - we are living longer and more healthily than ever. Every year, death comes a year closer for all of us, meanwhile life gets a little better for many people. So why are we happy to panic about the silliest things?
...
It's almost as if we have to be afraid of something, as if we carry about in our heads a bucket of worry that we are compelled to fill with whatever's available. Clearly, different individuals have different sized buckets.
The media doesn't get a free ride either.
Journalism is industrialized gossip... Once a newspaper's story about something extraordinary, say a killer-bee, has gone down well, others follow, rooting out killer-bee-related items that would otherwise have gone unreported, or building up killer-bee near-misses into full-blown dramas in their own right. The fact is that we love to be scared - which is why many of the topics we examine (and the bees) have their own disaster movies.
Even if you don't agree with every conclusion they draw, the authors are straight shooters with a good sense of humor. From the cover art featuring a spacesuit-clad man feeding pigeons, to a "panic scale" for each topic consisting of headless blood-squirting chickens, if you like Panic Watch! I'm pretty sure you'll like Panicology too.
We all know some people with pretty big buckets (many of them overflowing). So the next time one of them runs into the office waving the latest headline, sit them down with the appropriate chapter of this book and start that poor soul down the road of recovery.
Spanking Leads to Sexual Deviants?
Posted March 04, 2008 by

It's always fun when the media gets hold of a juicy-sounding study and runs with it, regardless of the source. Take for example, Spanking Kids Increases Risk Of Sexual Problems As Adults.
Professor Murray Straus claims that children who are spanked are more likely to eventually force sex from their partners, to not use condoms, and to have masochistic sex.
According to the article, Murray Straus is "co-director of the Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire". Sounds like an unbiased, reputable researcher. But Straus is actually a devout anti-spanking activist who has written articles for over a decade trying to scare parents away from spanking. Another article even quotes him admitting it:
"My underlying motive was to bring this to the attention of parents and of more people," Straus said, "in the hope it will help continue the decrease in the use of corporal punishment."
Yes, it's always good to come into a study with "underlying motives."
According to him, spanking will make your children violent, antisocial, stupid...and now sadomasochistic and condom-hating as well. As you'd imagine his work is a nothing too intensive; passing out surveys to college students about their childhood punishments and current sexual habits does not a great study make. And even then the statistical risk increases are insignificant.
Finally, correlation does not equal causation. There may be some link between spanked kids and questionable sexual practices, but why does it have to be the former causing the latter? Might not kids who are irresponsible and misbehave (and therefore get spanked a lot) continue to be irresponsible and misbehave as they move through adolescence and on to college? Seems plausible to me.
Read It How You Want
Posted March 03, 2008 by
Here's a good example of two very different media interpretations of the same study.
The scenario: 118 elderly people were given either Ginkgo Biloba or a placebo. 14 placebo people and 7 Ginkgo people developed memory problems. 7 Ginkgo people also had "mini-strokes" while no placebo people did (it should be noted here that Ginkgo has been reported to cause bleeding problems but the mini-strokes observed were from blood clotting, not excessive bleeding).
The numbers don't seem too impressive but let's see what the media has to say:
Jury out on Memory Benefits of Ginkgo Biloba
Older people who believe the supplement ginkgo biloba will keep their memories from declining do not as yet have solid scientific evidence to support that assumption.
Researchers studied 118 people age 85 and older who took either ginkgo biloba three times a day or a placebo. After the study, researchers could find no clear-cut benefit to taking the supplement.
Similar conclusions were drawn for a potential downside to ginkgo. Specifically, the supplement is known to cause bleeding problems, and in this study people who took it were more likely to have a stroke. But their strokes were mainly due to blood clots (not bleeding), so again, the researchers aren't certain about the role ginkgo may have played.
Now check out this version from Foodconsumer.org:
Ginkgo biloba helps memory, but may raise stroke risk
A study published online Wednesday Feb 27 in the journal Neurology suggests taking a ginkgo biloba extract may help maintain memory in elderly people.
But the same study also showed that the users of ginkgo biloba extract were at higher risk of mini-strokes or mild strokes.
WHAT THE HELL PEOPLE? Which is it? It is bad for me or good for me? The problem here (as usual) is that the study conclusions are weak to none.
The researchers found both: "In unadjusted analyses, ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) neither altered the risk of progression from normal to Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5, nor protected against a decline in memory function." So article #1 is technically correct. "Secondary analysis taking into account medication adherence showed a protective effect of GBE on the progression to CDR = 0.5 and memory decline." So article #2 is also technically correct.
Final conclusion? "Results of larger prevention trials taking into account medication adherence may clarify the effectiveness of GBE. More stroke and TIA cases observed among the GBE group requires further study to confirm."
Nothing definite here, so you're free to read into it whatever you want.
Calamity Still Looms
Posted March 01, 2008 by

In wake of record cold temperatures around the world in January and February, the CBC reminds us that global warming is still something to worry about!
A little skepticism might begin to creep into the public sphere and threaten to undermine public belief in global warming.
Fear not, says the CBC. We have nothing to worry about: climate calamity still looms. The good news is that the polar caps are still going to melt, hurricane risks are still mounting, drought conditions are more likely, forest fires are set to rage, and it's going to get hot, hot, hot.
Don't Eat the Yellow Snow...Or Any Other
Posted February 29, 2008 by

It used to be that a pristine blanket of snow was the archetypal image of purity. Walking through falling snowflakes was fun and romantic. And as long as you watched out where the Huskies went, you could even eat the stuff without feeling guilty.
But no longer. Reports are rolling off the presses that bacteria is the main ingredient in snowflakes. You might argue that water is probably still the "main" ingredient, or that these bacteria only hurt tomato and bean plants. But we argue that if you've somehow survived touching snow up to this point, you're a walking miracle.
Children are most at risk from snow since they are naturally drawn to its fun appearance. And since Panic Watch! is never one to sit back and let your children suffer, we've developed a list of helpful hints to get you and your family through the rest of the winter.
  • Construct a series of underground tunnels leading from your home to common destinations (school, grocery store, etc).
  • Call your child's teacher and request that they be sequestered in a closet or other windowless room during recess if snow is present on the school grounds.
  • Get your children on a regimen of powerful antibiotics ASAP in case they come into contact with snow while at school against your orders.
  • Prepare an Emergency Snow Drill and rehearse several times per week.
  • Young children should be comforted and reassured after seeing weather reports about snow storms. Remember, YOU are their protector!
  • Do not allow your child to watch movies and television shows which glamorize snow play, such as Snow Day, Snow Dogs, Frosty The Snowman, and most other Christmas movies.
With a little common sense and a lot of vigilance, we can all make it through this one together.
Will Moon Landing Nuts Scramble?
Posted February 24, 2008 by

Uh Oh... what are all the moon landing conspiracy theorists going to do when the winners of the Google Moon X-Prize land a robot on the surface of the moon and actually SEE all the equipment left by the Apollo missions? Well, that isn't one of the prize criterion to win the $20 million, but I'm sure they will attempt to land near the mission's remains in order to finally put one of the dumbest conspiracy theories to rest... forever.
There hasn't been an outcry (yet) that these private entrepreneurs will be corrupted by the government and beam back a 'fake' moon-cast; but we at Panic Watch! will be standing by to bring you the latest crap as the Google Moon X-Prize rolls along.
Top Threats!
Jan 25 - Mar 8, 2008
Global warming
Influenza
Mad cow / Foot and Mouth
E. coli
Salmonella
(See the full chart...) Recent Posts!
The Worst Panic
Media Stretches Shark Tale
Panic Rankings for February
Vaccine Quacks Rejoice!
Panicology
Spanking Leads to Sexual Deviants?
Categories!
© 2008 Panicwatch.org